> TM
cd ..

Building Clawbench: How We Benchmark LLM Outputs at Scale

If you've ever tried to compare two large language models side by side, you know it's harder than it sounds. Accuracy numbers on leaderboards tell one story. Real-world performance tells another.

That's why I built Clawbench — an open-source benchmarking and evaluation platform designed to test LLMs on the tasks that actually matter.

The Problem with AI Benchmarks

Most LLM benchmarks focus on standardized academic tasks: multiple choice, reading comprehension, math reasoning. These are useful, but they rarely reflect how people use AI in production.

When I was working on AI products at Accenture, JLR, and Samsung, the question was never "which model scores highest on MMLU?" — it was "which model gives us the most reliable outputs for our specific use case?"

That gap between benchmark performance and production performance is exactly what Clawbench addresses.

How Clawbench Works

At its core, Clawbench lets you:

  • Define custom evaluation suites tailored to your domain
  • Run structured comparisons across multiple LLM providers
  • Track performance over time as models get updated
  • Share results with your team through a clean dashboard

The evaluation pipeline is built in Python, with support for PyTorch-based custom metrics alongside traditional NLP scoring methods.

What I Learned Building It

Building evaluation tooling taught me a few things:

  1. Reproducibility is everything. If you can't reproduce a benchmark result, it's meaningless. Clawbench pins every variable — model version, prompt template, temperature, random seed.

  2. Speed matters more than you'd think. Running comprehensive benchmarks across 5+ models with thousands of test cases takes serious infrastructure. I spent significant time optimizing parallel execution.

  3. The UI is the product. Engineers won't use a benchmarking tool that requires reading docs for an hour. The Clawbench dashboard was designed to surface insights immediately.

Practical Tips for Benchmarking LLMs

If you're evaluating AI models for your project, here are some hard-won lessons:

  • Test on your actual data, not generic benchmarks. A model that excels at coding tasks might struggle with your customer support use case.
  • Measure consistency, not just accuracy. Run the same prompt 10 times and check the variance.
  • Include edge cases explicitly. LLMs fail silently on unusual inputs. Your benchmark suite should catch that.
  • Version everything. Models, prompts, test suites, results — all of it.

Try It Yourself

Clawbench is live and ready to use. Whether you're a solo developer comparing GPT-4 vs Claude, or a team evaluating models for production deployment, it gives you the structured evaluation framework you need.

If you're building AI products and care about shipping reliable outputs, give it a try. And if you're interested in how I'm building tools like this in public, check out my other projects or follow along on X.